The
Disabled Police Officers Counseling Center, Inc. (DPOCC) and the Disabled
Police Officers of America, Inc.(DPOA) Joint Report on a National Police
Disability Study
Reason for the National Study
My
name is Terry Morrison and I am President of the two organizations listed above
that initiated and sponsored this study. Both are non-profit 501(c) (3)
charitable organizations.
Through
these two organizations I have been playing a role in helping disabled police
officers around this country for over 16 years. Helping them cope with the emotional scars
that can develop as a result of a disabling injury and a subsequent forced
retirement from an occupation that was their life as much as it was their job.
Providing scholarship assistance to them so that they could afford to attend
colleges or technical training institutes to better support themselves and
their families after a disability retirement. Helping them to
pay their necessary living expenses such as rent, medicines, car payments or
other basic items that they may have fallen behind on. To perform these services of charitable
assistance it is my responsibility to secure necessary funding. Whenever I
reach out to the community, to the corporate sector or to Congress for help I am
asked a key question, “How many Disabled Retired Police Officers
are there in
I
would say to anyone asking me the question that I had been searching for that
data but wasn’t able to come up with any concrete numbers. I could speculate for
them that just based on the total number of law enforcement officers there are
at any one time in
In
pursuit of a better answer to this question I decided to do a nation wide study. Over a three year
period I wrote to over a thousand Chiefs of Police, Sheriffs, State Police
Superintendents and Governors from every state in the country asking them for
data they had on disability retirements. The results of that effort are
detailed later in this report. In addition to asking county, municipal and
state law enforcement departments, I contacted federal agencies such as the
Departments of Justice, Labor Statistics, and the Social Security
Administration. I was more than a little surprised to find out that none of
them kept this kind of information and didn’t know who might.
It
is important to acknowledge that our federal government does know exactly how
many disabled military veterans we have, what their disabilities are and what
benefits they receive in connection with those disabilities. The government
should know that information as those individuals served their country well and
in the process became disabled. In order to provide disabled military veterans with
the type and level of support they need it is critical to know how many there
are, what their disabilities are, where they are and who they are. To
accomplish this task the government created a number of agencies to gather the
requisite data, manage it, and help to ensure that the appropriate benefits and
support services are provided to our disabled military veterans. This is how it should be.
It
is my sincerest belief that the American nation owes no less to the men and
women in the law enforcement communities who have served and protected their
fellow citizens on a daily basis and who may have also become disabled in the
process. By and large this group of individuals is forgotten. They are, as we
have been told by many, forgotten on a local level where they served and certainly
on the national level where there is little awareness as to their numbers or
their plight.
Desired Outcomes from the DPOCC/DPOA
National Study on Police Officers Disabilities
The
primary desired outcome of this study would be to create awareness among
Americans that disabled police officers exist. They not only exist but do so in
large numbers across every state in
·
Information gathering – compile a database at a national level that will
be shared with the states as to the identification of all retired disabled
police officers along with their type and degree of disability.
·
Conduct a Benefits Equity Analysis – look at the issue of whether officers are
provided with fair and standard disability benefits across the country, whether
they served in state, county or municipal departments?
·
Appropriate Federal Funds – Provide funding to States to allow them to have
their state/county and municipal personnel/retirement system agencies participate
in this fact finding study. Provide funding and expertise in establishing a
state managed infrastructure to administer a fair and equitable program of
benefits and services to disabled police officers everywhere.
·
Recommend Creation of a National Memorial dedicated solely to the Disabled Law Enforcement Officer.
Results of National Police
Disability Study
Background: The first step we took in conducting this study
was to look for any hard data that dealt with police injuries and subsequent disability
retirements. There was no information or publication that we could find on
those subjects. But we did come across a publication produced by the Department
of Justice entitled, “Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA)”
for 2004. This publication provided our
first “hard” statistic on injuries to police officers.
The
LEOKA for 2004 contains data collected from 10,459 law enforcement agencies
that employed 499,396 officers concerning assaults and injuries. Of these
59,373 officers were assaulted while performing their duties and these assaults
resulted in 16,563 injuries to the officers. This information is unfortunately
only a piece of the puzzle. The LEOKA report does not include data on the many
other ways in which an officer can be injured nor more importantly any data on the number of disability retirements resulting even
from the 16,563 reported assaults.
Conducting the study - Our next step was to go to the source of the
disability retirements themselves. Over a 3 year period the DPOCC and the DPOA
wrote 889 letters to Governors, State Police Superintendents, Chiefs of Police
and Sheriffs from ever sector of the country. In these letters we asked the
individual agencies to provide us with the total number of retirements their
departments experienced over a defined 5 year period. Secondly we asked them to
break out from that total number the number of disability retirements. Below is
a table providing summary level data from their responses.
STATE POLICE SURVEY RESULTS
|
Number
of States Surveyed |
Number
of States Responding |
Total
Number of Retirements |
Number
of Disability Retirements |
Percentage
Disability Retirements |
|
50 |
21 |
9,347 |
1,009 |
10.8% |
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL DEPARTMENTS SURVEY RESULTS
|
Number of States Surveyed |
Number of States Responding |
Total Retirements 2000-2004 |
Number of Disability Retirements |
Percentage Disability Retirements |
|
50 |
36 |
31,459 |
4,081 |
13% |
Conclusion: The plight of the retired disabled police officer
in many cases is not a good one. Many feel disconnected from the jobs they
loved and the communities they served. Many experience emotion and financial
hardship. Many, if not most, feel they have no one to turn to for hope and
help. Yes, there are a number of organizations that do provide financial
assistance and recognition to the families of officers who have died in the
line of duty. That is admirable and certainly appropriate. But there seems to
be little help for the disabled officer. Some get decent pensions, many do not.
Some have good medical benefits but many do not. Some are able to re-integrate
back into society but many can not.
One
primary reason that is keeping these individuals from receiving the help they
need is a lack of awareness by Americans in general of their plight. Little is
printed in the papers or covered by TV specials about the trauma these individuals
face in carrying on with their lives after a disability retirement. Many are struggling
with severe emotional and financial repercussions. A second reason for keeping
things from getting any better for the retired disabled police officer is that
because there are no centralized reporting mechanisms in place to even tabulate
how many disable law enforcement officers we have in
The
DPOCC/DPOA study is a just a beginning. These two organizations don’t have the
funding it would take to conduct a scientifically valid study that would
support the need for action. Of the 889 letters we sent out to the 50 states from
2003-2005 we heard back from some departments in 72% of the states. However the
response total was only 14% of the agencies that were requested to supply
information on disability retirements. The
data from the 2003 inquiries showed that of the respondents 17,370 retirements
for the time period in question 1,703 or 9.8%were due to a disability. The data
from the 2005 inquiries, which were from different departments than written to
in the 2003 inquiries, there were 13,889
total retirements with 2,378 due to a disability or 17%. Combining the total
inquiries from Municipal departments from 2003 to 2005 gives you 31,459 total
retirements with 4,081 of them being disability related for a combined
percentage of 13% disability retirements.
13% of 1.5 million officers is 195,000. While
this is a very considerable number of itself we feel strongly that it is more
than likely way below the actual figure. That is because of the way that
departments report or in many cases don’t report disability retirements
Unlike
the retired disabled military veteran there is no central government agency in
place to ensure disabled retired police officers all receive fair and equitable
treatment. No one person or agency is responsible to see that they are provided
with fair compensation for their sacrifices and those of their families. This
is a difficult problem and it involves Federal and State political issues. I’m
not a politician and I don’t have a detailed plan for how